<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publishing Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tar.weatherson.org/2009/11/17/publishing-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tar.weatherson.org/2009/11/17/publishing-survey/</link>
	<description>Donate to Oxfam: &#60;a&#62;Australian link&#60;/a&#62;, &#60;a&#62;New Zealand link&#60;/a&#62;, &#60;a&#62;UK link&#60;/a&#62;, &#60;a&#62;US link&#60;/a&#62;.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:50:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Byrne</title>
		<link>http://tar.weatherson.org/2009/11/17/publishing-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tar.weatherson.org/?p=2461#comment-5937</guid>
		<description>*Kids*,

To &quot;pastiche&quot; Yul Brynner: *don&#039;t publish too much*, *don&#039;t publish too much*. Even if you have a &quot;slammin&#039;&quot; body and a famous father, &quot;restraint&quot; with respect to publication of serious intellectual material like philosophy --  although, in fact, this may *go* for philosophy less than for other fields -- is the &quot;mark&quot; of a *mature* and *responsible* author such as should wield intellectual &quot;clout&quot;; as you all do, and reasonably-enough in my book, though it might in fact be true (as Will Smith once said *in propria persona* as his mother &quot;&#039;Cause they&#039;re not good friends&quot;). 

Don&#039;t be like Jeffrey Daniel Rubard and friends; think before you &quot;style&quot; as a man of the left, or a &quot;disingenuous ingenue&quot;. No reason to as a &quot;fresh face&quot;, although if you&#039;re *30* and haven&#039;t written *your book* yet...

Have a happy holiday season.
Ruth Byrne
&quot;Lay sister&quot; (I&#039;m sorry, I had to say it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kids</strong>,</p>
<p>To &#8220;pastiche&#8221; Yul Brynner: <strong>don&#8217;t publish too much</strong>, <strong>don&#8217;t publish too much</strong>. Even if you have a &#8220;slammin&#8217;&#8221; body and a famous father, &#8220;restraint&#8221; with respect to publication of serious intellectual material like philosophy &#8212;  although, in fact, this may <strong>go</strong> for philosophy less than for other fields &#8212; is the &#8220;mark&#8221; of a <strong>mature</strong> and <strong>responsible</strong> author such as should wield intellectual &#8220;clout&#8221;; as you all do, and reasonably-enough in my book, though it might in fact be true (as Will Smith once said <strong>in propria persona</strong> as his mother &#8220;&#8216;Cause they&#8217;re not good friends&#8221;). </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be like Jeffrey Daniel Rubard and friends; think before you &#8220;style&#8221; as a man of the left, or a &#8220;disingenuous ingenue&#8221;. No reason to as a &#8220;fresh face&#8221;, although if you&#8217;re <strong>30</strong> and haven&#8217;t written <strong>your book</strong> yet&#8230;</p>
<p>Have a happy holiday season.<br />
Ruth Byrne<br />
&#8220;Lay sister&#8221; (I&#8217;m sorry, I had to say it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaslang</title>
		<link>http://tar.weatherson.org/2009/11/17/publishing-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-5878</link>
		<dc:creator>shaslang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tar.weatherson.org/?p=2461#comment-5878</guid>
		<description>So...thanks to all who have responded to the survey! It has been brought to my attention that the initial question on the survey wasn&#039;t capturing everyone we want. It suggested you needed to have a PhD in philosophy and a teaching job. But we want Emeritus/Emerita, people who hold research positions, and others who don&#039;t have a PhD (but only have a rough equivalent). So the first question has been altered. If you were rejected the first time you tried, please try again, and if you can&#039;t get on with the computer you used before, try another computer. Sorry for our confusion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;thanks to all who have responded to the survey! It has been brought to my attention that the initial question on the survey wasn&#8217;t capturing everyone we want. It suggested you needed to have a PhD in philosophy and a teaching job. But we want Emeritus/Emerita, people who hold research positions, and others who don&#8217;t have a PhD (but only have a rough equivalent). So the first question has been altered. If you were rejected the first time you tried, please try again, and if you can&#8217;t get on with the computer you used before, try another computer. Sorry for our confusion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
