The “papers blog”:http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Philosophy/Opp/ is posted for the day. I don’t know why it didn’t get done yesterday. I think I thought it had been completed when really it, er, hadn’t. So there’s plenty to chew on today.

While on the topic of books available online, Jordan Howard Sobel’s massive “Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God”:http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~sobel/Logic_Theism/ should be mentioned, though it’s a little too big for me to read through.

“Stephen Mumford”:http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/philosophy/staff/Mumford/MumfordPage.htm has posted an “abstract”:http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/philosophy/staff/Mumford/allegianceandidentity.htm of a paper forthcoming in the _Journal of the Philosophy of Sport_ but he hasn’t posted the full paper so I can’t tell you what’s wrong with it. It is on one of my favourite topics – identity conditions for sporting teams over time. Or, as I call it these days, the Cleveland Browns problem. One might think the Cleveland Browns problem is the lack of a good quarterback, or running back, or receiver, or any other kind of player really, but those aren’t philosophical problems. Although, what with the trends these days, “maybe they are”:http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/20/1082395861338.html.