Five Links

Some papers and stuff happening around the web.

The theme of the lecture was that the case Williamson makes in _The Philosophy of Philosophy_ against evidence being psychological states isn’t as strong as it might at first appear. I’ll be spelling out the themes of that in several blog posts over the next few days.

*Update*: I should add that many of the ideas in the lecture on evidence, and in the upcoming posts, came from conversations here at Arch{e’}, and especially a reading group on _The Philosophy of Philosophy_. The meeting on chapter 7 of the book, which I’m mostly writing about here, was led by “Daniele Sgaravatti”:http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~arche/members/member?id=sgaravatti, and his comments were especially useful.